McKenzie Banner e-edition                                      
                    
McKenzie Banner photos
                     News  |  Features  |  School  |  Sports  |  Events  |  Obituaries  |  Daily Obits  |  Public Notices  |  Blog


What is RSS

        Home About UsContact Us December 18, 2007
 
calendar
  COMMUNITY  
  Huntingdon TN  
  McKenzie TN  
  Retire in McKenzie  
  Carroll County Chamber of Commerce  
Paris-Henry County Tennessee
  SCHOOLS  
  McKenzie Schools  
Huntingdon Schools
  Hollow Rock-Bruceton  
  West Carroll Schools  
  Clarksburg School  
  Carroll County Board of Education  
  Bethel College  
  Tennessee Technology Center  
ATTRACTIONS
  The Dixie Carter Performing Arts and Academic Enrichment Center
Designed & hosted by The McKenzie Banner
CLICK HERE
for more Web sites created and hosted by The Banner
 









Click Here to sample the
e-edition

 
    
The Web
2005-08 Banner
2001-04 Banner

 
 

FEEDBACK: We're interested in your opinion. Send comments and story ideas here.

 

 

NEWS
 
Copyright 2007. Use by permission only.
 
Huntingdon School Board Approves $99,370 Middle School HVAC Bid
 
By Ernie Smothers
smothers@mckenziebanner.com
 

HUNTINGDON -- During its regular monthly meeting, Huntingdon Special School District school board members approved a $99,370 bid from Broadway Electric Company for purchase and installation of HVAC to the middle school gymnasium.

Broadway Electric’s bid was chosen over second-bidder Ellis Heating and Air Conditioning who submitted a bid of $145,000.

Prior to the vote, Huntingdon Superintendent of Schools Lynn Twyman informed the board that he had spoken to administrators at Scotts Hill High School regarding Broadway Electric’s installation of HVAC at their school and was told that they were satisfied with the company’s work.

Twyman noted that he had been informed by an engineer that the school could no longer use the existing hanging heater units in the middle school gym.

Board member Paul Ward Jr. addressed the board, “I am concerned with the expense. The cost is more than I thought. I feel the money would be better used in providing for teacher benefits.”

He added, “We only use the gym a little each year.”

Board chairman Dr. Lee Butler stated, “Purchasing this system now will save us money. It is a non-recurring cost that will benefit our school. If we pass on doing this now, it will cost a lot more when we come back around to this.”

Twyman added, “It obviously won’t be cheaper in the future. Based on funds available, this installation is an affordable project, but I will abide by whatever the board decides.

Board member Mark Bush said, “Half of this project is based on changing and upgrading the heating of the gym. The heating equipment will have to be replaced in the gym in the future, so it makes sense to act on this now.”

Board member David Gibson queried, “Who came up with the 30,000 tonnage for the HVAC?

Carter responded, “The architect. The rate of duct work and volume of space involved to heat and cool was the deciding factor in determining the unit tonnage.”

At the motion of Vice-Chairman Dr. Tony Tucker, the board approved the HVAC bid of Broadway Electric.

Board member Ward cast the lone opposing vote.

Steve Peery, director of technology for the school, informed board members regarding the school system’s eligibility for E-Rate bid funding for needed internal cabling, telephone / paging / voice mail and video distribution upgrades at Huntingdon Primary School.

Addressing the board, Peery began, “As you may recall, we met four years ago and discussed E-Rate funds. At that time, none of us knew much about it. Since then I have attended numerous meetings regarding E-Rate and now I know what it is and how to apply for it.”

He continued, “To do this the way we need to, it will be best if we run our own show in seeking E-Rate funding.”

Peery noted, “Based on free or reduced lunches offered to students at primary, middle and high school, the primary school yielded the highest percentages and qualified for E-Rate funds.”

He added, “The primary school is the oldest and is most in need for upgrades to internal cabling, telephone / paging / voice mail and video distribution systems.”

Peery noted, “Even if you (board) do decide to apply for funding and are approved, that does not obligate you to do the upgrades at the primary school. Voting for application just gets the ball rolling. It is a long process, and could take a year or two from application to acquisition of funds. This is a starting point.”

Peery noted that he had received by bids from Edu Tech of Dyersburg and Data Link Communications of Murray for providing installation for three separate items including internal cabling, telephone / paging / voice mail and video distribution.

Noting that Edu Tech’s interior cabling bid of $108,000 was far less than the $220,220 bid submitted by Data Link, Peery adding, “E-Rate would pay for 83-percent, or $89,640 of Edu Tech’s $108,000 bid cost, leaving the district to pay $18,360 for interior cabling.”

He added that despite the large price difference between Edu Tech and Data Link for interior cabling, the quality of components and system usability should not be noticeably different.

Peery said, “The difference between Edu Tech’s bid and Data Link’s is best summed up like this-you can buy a Cadillac or you can buy a Chevrolet. Edu Tech’s bid will cost the school system less and they will provide a good product. Edu Tech has installed systems for the Lexington School System and the TBI. They do a good job.”

He continued, “In regard to bids for installation of a telephone / paging / voice mail system, Edu Tech submitted a bid price of $24,130 which is far less expensive than Data Links bid of $69,737. Our school is eligible for $12, 161.52 in E-Rate funds, leaving the district to pay $14,968.48 for the Edu Tech-installed system, far less than the remaining amount of $40,469.42 the district would pay should you choose Data Link’s bid proposal.”

Peery noted that Data Link had provided a bid of $122,901.48 for installation of a video distribution system. After E-Rate eligibility reduction of $74, 804.48 the district would pay the remaining $60,813.76.”

He added, “They will only be providing 12 DVD systems and software. That’s not much for $60,813.76. I don’t feel that it would be cost-effective to video the primary school based on that price.”

He concluded by informing that although Edu Tech does install video distribution systems, they chose not to submit a bid price based on inherent contractual stipulations.

Tucker queried, “Will Edu Tech (installation) properly prepare the primary school for the future? What type of warranty does the company provide”?

Peery responded, “Edu Tech’s warranty is one-year, which is standard of all installers. They use category six wiring, which is top-of-the-line. Their price is less, but there won’t be a noticeable difference in usability.”

Twyman stated, “I suggest that the board pass on the video system.”

Tucker motioned that the board accept Edu Tech’s internal cabling and telephone / paging / voice mail system bid price and pass on Data Link’s video distribution bid.

The board unanimously approved the bid.

Following the vote, Peery said, “I will keep you abreast of progress regarding our E-Rate application.

In other business, Twyman stated that the school’s system report card revealed no deficiencies.

He said, “Our school has great attendance and graduation rates, and I am proud to inform that K-8 Reading and Language Arts grades improved from B to A. Academic growth for K-8 received all A’s.”

He continued, “Math grades have improved, but our three-year average needs to improve. We have hired a new math teacher at the high school and hope to see improvement in Gateway and Algebra scores.”

Twyman thanked the schools teachers, counselors and board for their continued commitment to the schools educational achievement.

The board approved the following Food Service changes: Offer vs. Serve policy; charge policy providing teachers pay their charge costs at the end of each month and competitive Food policy.

Carter informed that the board would perform the annual review of the superintendent’s contract at the January meeting.

 
MORE LOCAL HEADLINES
 
December 18, 2007
 

 

Home |  News  |  Feature  |  School  |  Sports  |  Obituaries  |  Daily Obits  |  Calendar
Public Notices  |  Archives  |  Real Estate Guide  |  Sponsors' Ads  | West TN Advertiser
Advertise Online  |  Products  |  Web Design & Hosting  |  News Tips/Ideas 
Ad Rates (PDF)  | Deadlines/Policies  |  Subscribe |  About Us  |  Contact Us

The McKenzie Banner
 3 Banner Row, PO Box 100
 McKenzie, TN 38201
 731-352-3323 FAX: 731-352-3322
 editor@mckenziebanner.com

copyright 2006-2008 by Tri-County Publishing Co., 2007
 
 




 

 The McKenzie Banner

 
Click the Photo Reprints button below to buy reprints of almost any photo in The McKenzie Banner print edition.
McKenzie Banner photos
70 year fade life
35 mm quality

Photos are mailed directly to you. Don't see what you're looking for? Give us a call at 731-352-3323.